Back to discussions

Discussion thread

We are the victims of a cowboy builder in Wellington

Read this thread as context for better builder due diligence. Original historical wording is preserved and comments are not independently verified unless labelled.

Source and review policy

This thread is one source, not a verdict

Historical comments are preserved for context with original wording where possible. They are not independently verified unless labelled, and may not reflect current circumstances. Use them alongside public records, third-party review sources, contract checks, and a direct response from the builder.

Alice

We are the victims of a cowboy builder in Wellington. $50K of defects and associated costs so far. Our situation aside, was disgusted that he was already the subject of a LBP Board investigation for negligence while he was busy constructing our extension not to plans, consent or building code. Further inquiry reveals that to be an LBP you only need a carpentry qualification, two referees and a telephone interview. No character referees, drug tests, or even a police check. Investigations take months and months, with no restrictions or supervision of the builder (unlike other professions where they are either stood down or work under supervision). No wonder we still have leaky buildings. Of course if it goes wrong, the LBP can quickly shut down their company to avoid all claims. Good to see the government has announced a review of the construction industry: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/have-your-say/building-system-legislative-reform-programme-public-consultation?fbclid=IwAR0R3iEJk1jX86m5bJMjyxmnvvws1sGrV3M1uY2dhUOz3kwpqa4zfwrnC0U Hope other affected homeowners submit their experiences! If you are entering a construction contract, I suggest you add a clause for drug testing and police checks seeing as the licensing board doesn’t bother. Odd that a hammer hand or forklift operator may have to pass these basic requirements, but an LBP director can do what they like.
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114862Source link

Laurence

I fail to see the relevance of drug testing to your complaint.
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114866Reply to #114862Thread #114862Source link

Alice

I think it a reasonable expectation that a licensed building practitioner is not under the influence of drugs or alcohol while doing or supervising restricted building work and running a building site. Just as an employer may expect it of an employee.
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114868Reply to #114866Thread #114862Source link

Marie

In my experience finding that, on your way home and passing your new build house (at almost midnight) is lit up like a Christmas tree, doors open, no tradesman in sight is an alarming experience. Especially when you phone him to find out why your new build is as described above, only to find that he has been picked up by the police, unable to drive in a straight line because he is less than sober. I still have no idea when he left the site but he had been with the police for most of the day.
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117663Reply to #114866Thread #114862Source link