Back to discussions

Discussion thread

a detailed estimate from a trusted builder

Read this thread as context for better builder due diligence. Original historical wording is preserved and comments are not independently verified unless labelled.

Source and review policy

This thread is one source, not a verdict

Historical comments are preserved for context with original wording where possible. They are not independently verified unless labelled, and may not reflect current circumstances. Use them alongside public records, third-party review sources, contract checks, and a direct response from the builder.

Mike

Hi Guys, We are looking to do a renovation of an untouched weatherboard 1950s bungalow we recently bought in Auckland and have a couple of questions below. For context, the reno will involve knocking down a few internal walls, enclosing laundry porch area, insulation, re-wiring, re-plumbing, new kitchen, new bathroom, new en-suite, painting, floors 1) Given this is a decent reno, should we get a quantity surveyor to itemise and cost vs. a detailed estimate from a trusted builder? 2) Would anyone recommend a central auckland builder or company for a fairly straight-forward reno such as this? Cheers, Mike
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117703Source link

markgraham

Hi Mike My personal recommendation is http://www.ctlconstruction.co.nz. They’re not the cheapest but their work is excellent. A decent building company will use a QS anyway but doesn’t hurt to get another costing done. So long as you have a detailed list of the work to be done and a detailed list of materials specified you should get an accurate idea of costs, however renovations have a way of going south once the gib comes off and you can see what’s behind the walls, so make sure you allow for contingencies. A friend ended up with a $50k drainlaying bill for reasons that they were not originally anticipating, so these things can hit you from elsewhere, too. Good Luck! And Don’t Make Changes halfway through.
Reply
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117705Reply to #117703Thread #117703Source link