Discussion topic

Builder discussion about contracts

Read homeowner discussion connected to contracts. Use these comments to spot questions worth asking before you sign, vary a contract, or accept a builder response.

Source and review policy

Topic pages collect signals for further checking

Historical comments are preserved for context with original wording where possible. They are not independently verified unless labelled, and may not reflect current circumstances. Use them alongside public records, third-party review sources, contract checks, and a direct response from the builder.

What to check when reading about contracts

Contract comments are useful when they point to clauses, payment timing, fixed-price assumptions, exclusions, dispute steps, and whether the homeowner had independent advice before signing.

  • Get legal advice before signing a high-value building contract.
  • Check payment milestones, variation clauses, and termination terms.
  • Confirm whether the quote, plans, and specifications line up.

Andrew Tideswell

For your own well-being stay away from Enjoinery – years of work and massive cost and time overruns and sloppy work which was non compliant and inthe end I had to fix myself have wrecked my health and financial ability to keep the place. Can provide photos such as bird sized holes in flashing, sub standard insulation and literally dozens of other faults – sadly as he was the freind of a friend I trusted him and had him on an hourly contract. To add insult to injury, they promoted my place on their website as an example of a successful project.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #121295Source link

Ed

Hi there, we are about to sign the contract with Peter Ray homes in Christchurch. Can I please have some feedback about them regarding their time, cost and deliveries? Many thanks,
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #121283Source link
Reply in discussion thread #119560View thread

JE

Hi Neesha We built with Landmark Canterbury which was one of the worst experiences of our lives. Despite contacting the Franchisor Landmark NZ on several occasions asking for their assistance, we ended up issuing legal proceedings against LMC. After a dispute which had been ongoing for almost 2 years, LMC settled the full amount claimed on the morning of the adjourned hearing.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #120436Reply to #119560Thread #119560Source link

Jennifer Morris

A warning to anyone having repairs for large Insurance claims. Monitor all the time and report back to your Insurance company anything you are concerned about. It may take multiple assessments to get your concerns addressed but worth it to ensure the repairs are up to standard. I’m still getting my claim sorted, over 2 years now. Finally the Insurance company had the job assessed by an expert and job not to standard and explicit instructions not followed. Shortcuts were made and the Insurance company notified many times to get problems rectified prior to this last report. In defense of the Insurance company they have attempted to sort things out but it has been long and drawn out. A stressful 2 years. Now having another company coming to rectify the other builders mistakes. I recommend not signing off the claim until you are 100% satisfied or if offered a payout don’t accept. I was offered payouts and fortunately I didn’t. The problems found are major.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #119709Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117893View thread

G

Hi David, yes. leaving was the best decision. worst company to ever work for. Management have no idea how to run a business, invoices go unpaid for months and then sub-trades and other external contractors put their services on hold, which delays builds/consenting etc, constant lies to staff, lies to clients, the lower level workers are good but its all negatively impacted by the higher up’s
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117932Reply to #117928Thread #117893Source link

Kelly

Does anybody have experience/ comments with Benchmark Homes in Christchurch? Was trying to look through using CTRL+F but didn’t find much information relating to them. Few questions for new builds: 1. Common pitfalls to look out for in a new build contract. I see that PC sum is something builders can use to add on cost. Any other glaring clauses one should pay attention to? 2. What is a reasonable cost now to build psm in Christchurch? 3. For land and build (staged payment, not turnkey), does sunset clause apply? 4. Any idea what is the typical number of homes builders like Greenland/ Orange/ Benchmark would build in a year?
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117884Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117821View thread

Chris C

Hi Rachel, It would be unusual if a builder lets you ‘draft’ a contract entirely to your own liking, but I guess more unlikely things sometimes happen. More likely they will want you to use a contract form supplied by them. And if you’ve followed this blog for long you’ll know that many (most?) of them will be reluctant to change anything much. But anyway I suggest you start by hitting Ctrl F and putting things like ‘contract’, ‘PS’ and ‘Provisional Sum’ in the search box. When you look through the many entries that come up, it may lead you to other words to search for. Also check the Building Regulations for the minimum requirements for contracts over $30K, and the NZ Standard form of building contract. Consult an experienced lawyer, or maybe QS, if you have no experience with drafting building contracts. It can be very expensive and stressful if you get it wrong. I would advise you don’t give a builder any money, or at least no significant amount (ie more than you can afford to write off to the cost of buying experience), until you’re satisfied with the contract wording. Many builders will try to persuade you it’s something that can be sorted out later. But if you do pay money for things like concept drawings, or site surveys or investigations etc, make sure that you have a share of the copyright, and can use the information if you pull out and go with another builder.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117822Reply to #117821Thread #117821Source link

LM

Hello, I am hoping someone can help me with some advice I entered a build contract in Feb 2021 with a national franchise to build a simple two storey home. To date progress has been excruciatingly slow, for a long time I gave them the benefit of the doubt as the previous home on the section needed to be demolished and this relied on external contractors but now that the build is on them and they are continually failing to meet any deadlines and make promises of work timeline that aren’t met. A concrete slab was finally laid March this year and to date they haven’t yet managed to complete the wall framing almost 3 months later. I drive past other builds regularly and see must faster progress. The speed of the build is causing me financial and emotional stress but the project manager and franchise owner don’t care and believe the speed of the build is reasonable and have heavily blamed covid. They have taken all access to timelines off me and when I ask for updated timelines and expected handover date either my e-mail is ignored, they tell me that timelines are just for booking contractors or give vague approximations of a handover date. The whole situation has left me feeling completely powerless and often in tears. I don’t want to name and shame the business yet but I wouldn’t want anyone to sign a build contract with them and have to go through what I am. They have all the power in this situation and can take as long as they want to build the house. I understand covid has caused material/trade problems but the delays I am seeing seem completely unreasonable. Is there anything I can do? Thanks
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117807Source link

Chris C

Hi All, I’d just like to draw your attention to an article in the NZ Herald today (17/3/22), page A7, concerning a legal dispute between some house owners’ and the Nelson franchise of G J Gardner Homes (LSK Builders Ltd). The dispute is obviously long standing and complex, and I have no comment on who is in the right. The point of interest is that it appears the builder has used a clause in the Contract to ‘register a mortgage over the title to the property’. I may be wrong, but I suspect the Contract may be the Master Builders one, which contains a clause like this. This issue has been discussed before in this blog. I’m not a lawyer, but in my opinion common sense should tell anyone about to build who is presented with a Contract containing a clause like this that they should ask for it to be deleted.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117768Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117724View thread

Chris C

Hi Simon, No pressure from MJ then. But to you and also him (again assuming he’s male), it’s true I’ve put a bit of time into commenting on some previous queries, but to be honest in some cases have not even received an acknowledgement back. I’m happy to put a bit more time into some comments on yours, but they would be based on my experience with a build around 2015/16, using RMB RBC1-2011, which it appears from your comment about the Mortgage clause numbers may be different to the 2018 form. Which, by the way, if similar to the 2011 form I would most definitely like to see removed. Especially as it can be initiated just over a failure to pay on a ‘due date’, when you might justifiably be withholding payment because work is unsatisfactory/unfinished. Even worse, it seems simply by signing the contract you are giving the RMB power of attorney to initiate action. By all means ask a lawyer, but I think that would border on crazy. You have to trust the builder not to screw you, and he has to trust you to pay. But anyway there are other ways to ensure he gets his money if it’s reasonably due. Our RMB agreed to delete it, but times were perhaps different in 2015. But before going further, I’d be grateful if you can let me know whether you think my comments would be relevant to your situation.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117727Reply to #117726Thread #117724Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115182View thread

Marie

Having similar problems with our builder (BPM Contracts/Thermawise/Campbell Grant Senior & partner Ricky Pene) as the Local Authority could not issue a CCC due to the multiple fail notices for their work from the concrete floor to the leaking roof. No other builder will even look at the roof so their reputation precedes them. They don’t pay their subbies when you make progress claims that you pay to the builder therefore the subbies down tools till they are paid. Can you blame them ??? We have found a builder to fix most of the interior fail notices but as we have now paid them and the original builder it’s time they paid us back for the work they did not complete and were failed on. We have even paid for an independent inspection report, they even took the time walked around the site with our lawyer, Mr Senior and the fail reports but the builder is still oblivious and still can’t (or more likely won’t) see the problems ???
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117667Reply to #115182Thread #115182Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117641View thread

Marie

Hi Mark Glad to hear that the evidence presented to you has convinced you that the information is true, factual and as well as a private nightmare ! Along with the independent builders report that concurs with the local authority building inspectors reasons for failing much of his work. The problems shared by the subcontractors just about covers our problem with C G senior & R Penne of Thermawise/BPM Contracts Ltd of Levin. If they had stuck to the contract then none of this would have been so painful, but as they will not follow the LBP Handbook nor the LBP guidelines for members to follow then it’s up to them if they will now come to the arbitration table and pay us what they owe us. Following legal advice there will be no reply directly to the builder.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117644Reply to #117643Thread #117641Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117581View thread

MJ

Yes, as usual Chris you are the level headed one and I just react first and think later so sorry James if I alarmed you but I suppose the whole thing hinges on your contract as it stands now. The last build I did I got several different quotes from builders and building companies and one thing that I remember was that each had it’s own version and variations as to what constitutes a PC. Some were more confident at setting prices on certain things while others were not but not one of them was the same and the only thing that was similar, which our lawyer always found (bless him) was that the wording was vague which was intentional for many of these outfits. We asked for changes to the wording, 99% of these quotes said No, we never make changes to our standard contracts and we walked away. Simple. So if your contract has clear definitions of what they consider to be a PC then as Chris pointed out, it’s probably not a bad way to go especially given the state of building materials and transit delays etc at the moment. The issue I had (and again I apologise for not making this clearer and sounding all doomsdayish) is that this offer has only been presented to you now and by the sounds of it you are well on your way to putting in your first pile? Please correct me if I’m wrong. I see an awful lot of people become over-invested either financially or emotionally in their build before the due diligence is done, only for the terms to change at the last minute and they feel they have no choice but to say yes and keep going because they would lose too much to say no and I don’t want this amended clause to be like that for you. As Chris has said numerous times, to walk away from $5k’s worth of drawings etc because the contract is sub-par could possibly save you $50k down the line. Get your lawyer to look over it, even be the devils advocate and argue it’s pros and cons with you. I know at the end of the day $30k is a drop in the ocean compared to what you’ll eventually part with but that’s all your landscaping, fencing and perhaps decking funds so take the time to think it through. Don’t let them rush you. If they put pressure on you to accept before you can do some sums then maybe it is a little hinky? Let us know how you get on?
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117584Reply to #117583Thread #117581Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117554View thread

MJ

And I forgot to add that a building and construction lawyer can use all the expert reports and put together a sound case for the LBPB as well which you will need if you do intend to take his licence to task. Sadly the LBPB do have a reputation for being a little on the limp side with regards to reprimanding shoddy cowboy builders but it can be done (we have done it very successfully) and sometimes with the double threat of legal representation and a complaint to the LBPB it may be just enough for your builder to see sense. I hope you don’t need to use any of these avenues and he shows up first thing tomorrow morning with an apology and a full team at the ready to fix his mistakes. Good luck and let us know How you get on.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117557Reply to #117554Thread #117554Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117474View thread

Natty

Hi there I read your post and comments about how deceptive the Building Companies are. I have had a similar experience and it was a costly and painful one. You think you are signing up with a reputable company, that prides itself with honesty and integrity, but in reality, they are not. In my case, the contracted price which was based on a concept design changed dramatically. The Building Company refused to provide a detailed breakdown on the price variation and sighted that this information was ‘Trade Secrets.’ I then had hired a Quantity Surveyor to independently price the Contract and the results were absolutely alarming. QS found the Building Company substantially underpriced the build to lock you into a Build Contract and once you sign up, they then rectify the under-pricing with a substantial increase to the build price. The disappointing thing is that Building Companies can do this because the Contract is based on Provisional Sums and Provisional Costs. I could go on, but this company is already paying a big price for its dishonesty and lack of integrity. All the staff including the sales reps have left and there is lots of talk within the local community about how incompetent this company is. This company is an embarrassment to the Franchise. It is only a question of time when this Company complete folds. The Law of Karma!!
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117536Reply to #117534Thread #117474Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117457View thread

Sanjay Bhowmick

Hi Chris: I have noted to compare with the NZS3902 form. Good to know about the ‘Deemed to be included’ clause. Thanks. Just now I am about to bung in the building consent application to the Council and expect to look at the builder’s contract in about a month. I will then take up your kind offer and bounce off critical issues on the contract if I may, Chris. Would you have an idea how much the engineering design for two standard 3-bed houses should cost? Welcome any feedback from anyone else too. Many thanks. Sanjay
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117475Reply to #117463Thread #117457Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117457View thread

Chris C

Hi Sanjay, I had the house we’re now living in built, based on the then MB contract, in 2015/16. Not sure whether it has since been modified. But at that time it definitely required some modifications to make it acceptable to me. So part of the reason we used the builder we did was because he was very open to making the changes I wanted (not all builders are). If you have time I’d be interested to hear what your lawyer says about the MB and NZS forms, because some lawyers who claim a knowledge of building contracts don’t actually have much. Unless the MB form has been modified a lot since 2016 (which I doubt), in my view if he/she thinks it’s fine as it stands they are not giving you good advice. I would hope they suggest some changes, but some I’ve found try to sell you their own form, in the hope the builder will accept it. This whole issue of contracts is a kind of Catch 22. If you have a nice, honest, competent builder, who is not out to rip you off, and who you can discuss and agree things with in a reasonable way, then the contract can become almost irrelevant. But if things start to go wrong (as they so often do on any construction contract), then the only thing you have to fall back on is exactly what it says in the contract. Nothing more. So when you’re writing the contract you can hope for the best, but you must plan for the worst. It appears that house building in NZ can be a bit of a minefield for the inexperienced and the unlucky, so the more competent advisers you can get on your side the better. Good luck.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117462Reply to #117459Thread #117457Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117417View thread

Nigel harrison

Did you read every clause in the contract and understand exceptions, cop outs, delivery dates and associated qualifications, deposit amount and payment schedule amongst a few. If not go back to square 1. If it was like my experience with one of the large building franchises and requesting a copy of the contract from the salesman, he said it was about 55 pages. I replied I’d read all 55 odd pages. That’s the last i heard from them. By the bye builders and developers have the whip hand. Good luck with trying to change anything that favours them.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117418Reply to #117417Thread #117417Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117265View thread

Rachelle P

Thanks Chris The name of the developer was on the title and the developer was also the seller in the Agreement for Sale & Purchase, we had no idea someone else had purchased the property before title was issued in 2019 and was still not recorded as the correct owner in 2020. We signed the Masterbuild guarantee when we signed the build contract. In hindsight we should not have paid the deposit until the Masterbuild guarantee was received back. Basically we trusted the builder and also believed that because it was a franchise the master franchisee was giving us extra protection – we could not have got it more wrong. Basically I am trying to find out who else in this subdivision was caught. And also why does the Master Builders Association not care more about its branding?
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117268Reply to #117266Thread #117265Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115875View thread

Chris

Hi Sam, My Beach Haven subdivision went on the back burner but I am looking to pick things up again. Keen to hear where you got to? Who did you go ahead with and how was your experience? You can call me on 021 961 840 if still interested in having a chat. My subdivision consent has been approved and I am now looking to find a good contractor to manage & complete the physical works up to the point of title issue (drainage and other services + driveway replacement). If anyone has any company recommendations to complete this work that would be appreciated. Thanks, Chris.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117234Reply to #116747Thread #115875Source link
Reply in discussion thread #117152View thread

Sally

Out of those three Peter Ray would be the best. We have built with PR before and my husband used to sub-contract for them. They are very nice people and they are very honest and customer was always right. Their quotes are pretty much spot on too – we didn’t have any unexpected costs. I don’t know many builders in that area but one I would always avoid in any area would be Golden Homes – haven’t had good experiences with them.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #117153Reply to #117152Thread #117152Source link
Reply in discussion thread #116887View thread

Anon

Hi, No it’s a fixed price when you sign the contract. There have been a lot of movements in the price after we signed the contract but that has been driven by us in the form of adding and upgrading. You will have the contract/price but post contract is where you can go and have consults with the various suppliers. There is a big range that comes within the confines of the contract but you may go outside that, which costs extra.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #116904Reply to #116897Thread #116887Source link

Thuy

Hi all My name is Thuy, my partner and I signed a house and land contract with NZ first house = Eco Smart home since September last year. Until now there is no further process for anything, except the street name and house number. They keep telling us that house title has been released by council yet. We checked the director of Eco Smart Home, he seems has a history . The lawyer we use was suggested by Eco Smart Home, he told us the sunset date is October 14, 2020, if there is still no process till this date, we can cancel the contract. Is there any thought, experience about this? Or anyone has the same issue like us? Thank you
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #116901Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115875View thread

Chris

Hi Sam, the numbers you have stated are very similar to the numbers I have been told. I had a 250 sq meter design done which was then estimated by 2 builders at 700+ to build. Add the inevitable contingency (10-15%) onto that and I was looking at 800ish for a basic home of that size. I have had to rethink and have had a much smaller 150 sq meter design done which I will probably go with. You have to remember that there are not that many houses in Beach Haven valued greater than $1M so 800k + land value (lets say 400k min) will likely put you in a negative equity position at this point in time. This is only relevant from a risk management perspective so if you are confident that you will hold the house for a long period of time it is less of an issue. Yes building and material costs have gone through the roof in the last 3-5 years. At least that is what the builders and architects have told me. I build a 220 sq in Auckland 5 years ago for a lot less. I would be very careful if you get much more attractive cost estimates from the group builders as they are very good at sucking you in at this stage – add 30-50% contingency rather than 10-15%!! (that’s even with a fixed price contract). Plus all the stress and BS you will have to go through. Please lets continue to share insights as I am still trying to navigate through this as well.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #116746Reply to #116745Thread #115875Source link
Reply in discussion thread #116365View thread

John

Anyone building with Landmark Homes would be well advised to do their due diligence. They market themselves as Luxury Home builders,do not be fooled by flashy show homes or slick salespeople. Landmark Homes have a very one sided contract that is heavily biased toward them to the point of being an “unfair contract”,they will not accept any changes to the contract. They make extensive use of ” P SUMS” in their contracts which is a best guess of cost which they don’t have to adhere to. So your quoted price may be considerably more than the actual price sometimes as much as 100-150%. If they are professionals then they should know what the cost is not mislead people as to what the actual cost is as lets face it all money is hard to earn and unexpected cost overruns can be very stressful. They do have good designers and salespeople,but thats where it ends,once you pay your deposit you are treated more as a nuisance not the paying customer. They hire the cheapest labour they can without verifying their skills with huge consequences. Would you want to risk it. Run their contract past your solicitor first it may save you some anguish.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #116400Reply to #116365Thread #116365Source link
Reply in discussion thread #116032View thread

Sam

Natty unfortunately if you have p sums in your contract then its not a fixed price. The p sum issue is used to quote you a price that you find acceptable,if you are dealing with an unscrupulous builder he can charge pretty much what he likes as you have agreed to it,its like an open checkbook. We were caught with the same things on our contract,sure if you cannot ascertain the cost of something beforehand then then it may get used. In our case the p sums were abused every time,when we questioned it we were told they only have to supply an invoice. We considered losing our $100k deposit and walking away ,we were reassured it was the only time. It wasn’t! In retrospect the rot had set in and every opportunity they had to apply the p sum they did,some by as much as 100 percent. These are supposed to be experienced builders the costs are quantifiable ,they should be able to keep to the quoted price. Nothing you can do. If I had my time again it would have been cheaper to walk away and start again and avoid many years of grief as it was a total nightmare.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #116140Reply to #116121Thread #116032Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115370View thread

Kelly

Hi, you’ve clearly been through something major like I have, its not until your in the thick of it that you see and learn exactly how things roll. No surprises how difficult it is dealing with the LBP. Out of the 8 members on the board of the LBP its Not surprising that 5 have had affiliations with Certified and Masterbuilders. The website states Board members Chris Preston is ex CEO of Masterbuilders and Richard Merrifield is ex chairman of Certified builders, Bob Monteith is an ex board member of Certified builders, Faye Pearson-Green is a regional judge for Masterbuilders, and David Fabish is a life member of Masterbuilders. If you ever have to deal with either of these building organisations when dealing with problematic builders you learn very quickly how the old boys network works. Dealing with the LBP seems an extension of this very network. You are so right,,, everything must be in writing! No phone conversations and as sad as this sounds given the state of the industry, that should be the only form of communication once the contract is signed from that day forward to everyone involved in your build whether its the builder/engineer/council, these building orgs etc everything in writing and keep all of it in a properly organised filing system per organisation so you have ease of access when needed.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115964Reply to #115962Thread #115370Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115370View thread

Alice

Completely agree with MJ in regards to contracts AND the ineptitude of the Licensing Board. Our builder was already under investigation, without our knowledge. 12 months to investigate and hold an overtly biased hearing (complainants aren’t even called as witnesses). Builder found negligent (overwhelming evidence) but NO PUNISHMENT!! Despite being an actual scammer with multiple victims! LBP is free to go on and scam new unsuspecting clients.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115959Reply to #115859Thread #115370Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115875View thread

Kelly

Hi Glen, MJ makes alot of really valid points. You have sought info on this website for a reason, whilst its easy to get caught up in the excitement of a build its easy to think “that or this wont happen to me” “Not everyone has a bad build experience”. I totally agree dont be fooled by logo/membership promoting. Belonging to any of these building organisations does mean diddly squat these days. Think seriously on the advice of people who have been through the process of dealing with these organisations when things go pear shaped just with their members alone. Something to consider if you are looking or thinking about taking out their insurance policy, These building organisations are unregulated and are membership organisations first and only. Put it this way,,, you are always going to have a fight on your hands with any insurance company when filing a claim, the bigger the claim the harder the fight, it can get nasty. If the builder does dangle his organisations own products in your face be careful, why make it 10 times worse for yourself by signing an insurance contract with an organisation whose first priority is to defend/back their members, and more importantly check who is backing the guarantee, credit ratings, no invested interest or conflicts etc, you should do that with any insurance product. I strongly advise you seek an independent insurance provider not connected if they approach you with the masterbuild guarantee/contracts etc and ALWAYS run things past a reputable building lawyer before signing anything.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115884Reply to #115878Thread #115875Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115370View thread

M J

Alex, I completely agree with Chris on this. Unless Stonewood Tauranga have changed management in the last three months and amended their contracts I would strongly suggest you walk away. Once the roller coaster starts there’s no stopping it and unless you have very deep pockets and the patience of a saint it will be the worst experience of your life. Almost two years we’ve been fighting our horror of a build and we still have no resolution to this nightmare and if you think the LBP Board will help you, they won’t in fact they protect the builder more than the they do you so choose very carefully.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115859Reply to #115857Thread #115370Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115463View thread

Chris

Hi MJ, I was interested to read your reply to someone who confessed to being an older lady who has no experience, and very little knowledge, of house building. I have read many entries on this blog of other people who seem to perhaps be younger, but otherwise in a similar situation. I’m not sure how many of them realise that the common system in NZ (and I think to some extent in Australia) of buying a piece of land, and then employing a builder you have never met before, to build you a unique home (because even their ‘standard’ designs will end up as unique, due to variations in the site and your choices of fittings etc) is extremely unusual from a world point of view. And due to the nature of the building industry here, with poor control of builders and materials by Government and Councils, poor legal safeguards if builders rip people off or go bankrupt, and in fact many builders who are relatively inexperienced, and have poor project and cash flow management skills, because they don’t actually build many houses, it is extremely risky. Which is why so many people find it goes wrong. Even the nice, honest builders can get caught out with cash flow problems. In other countries normal houses are usually built by large builders, who obtain large blocks of land, then get one architect and one engineer to design and get Council approval for a variety of different size houses of similar style. So they can employ experienced project managers and large scale construction, which makes it easier to maintain quality, while keeping costs down. So I think your advice to this lady that it is probably cheaper, and certainly safer, to buy a house already built, is good. But if she ignores your good advice, and goes ahead with getting a draughts-person (I’m being PC) to prepare some plans, I’d like to ask what you got for $5K? I assume that was just for some basic concept drawings, perhaps with just layout plans and elevations. Because in my experience people should budget for something closer to 10% of the construction cost, more like $50K, to get full construction drawings that can be submitted to Council, including all the engineering design and detail drawings, and Council fees etc. Plus of course other paperwork and inspections required during and at the end of construction, to get code compliance.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115661Reply to #115642Thread #115463Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115463View thread

J

I know a few Cambridge people who have used Buildtech and are very happy. They actually manage the project and it is sub-contracted to other builders they know are good. Benefit of this is they know how to deal with the tradesmen and what to look out for and what is expect and you can be free to raise any concerns without offending the tradesman.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115660Reply to #115498Thread #115463Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115328View thread

Transparent to the Max

So pleased you posted this CS. We entered into a contract with a customer who initially came to us telling us that the GJs price was cheaper than ours. I challenged them, asked them to go back to GJs and get in writing the site build up of 1 metre with block height allowed for and a few other details. She was shocked to find all they promised was not accommodated for in the contract and their sales pitch of ‘we purchase large volume being the largest builder in the market and you the customer reaps the benefits of it’ was farcical. We ended up doing the build for this wonderful young couple at 30k (yes 30k) less than GJs and they got their fantastic view of Auckland along with all the spec they required and are still happily living in their gorgeous first home. They continue to be a referee for us to this day and we are proud to have them as one of our ongoing customers. All I can say of GJs is their marketing team does a fantastic job in the media and that is where potential customers get confused. Due diligence is a home owners responsibility to carry out.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115550Reply to #115328Thread #115328Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115369View thread

Transparent to the Max

You are correct in your statement as there are very few good ones out there of the franchised group housing coys. They buy into these companies solely on financial ability to fund being a franchisee for the franchisor. Not their ability to conduct a quality build, understand the build process, use quality products, price with integrity and complete the process with good communication and financial stability. It speaks volumes that Refresh Renovations are marketing on fb that they want business owners stating they do not want builders. I would have thought renovation work carries huge build competency requirements but apparently this company wants sales and marketing background people to run these ventures. Not many people realise that Oncore, Refresh and one other have same directors operating these businesses overselling areas to franchisees. Joe public are paying for these franchise fees same as group housing companies. This is the major issue with our industry currently and it has been happening for some time now. We are in disarray and the home owner is being conned by bullshit, hollow promises and fake news as to a build promise and understanding of expectation. For good companies and contractors it is a mine field of endeavouring to communicate to joe public that cheap means exactly that. Quality and longevity comes down the list rather than first on the list in selection for a builder. If NZers want to build sustainable long-standing issue free homes to enjoy and live in then look to partner with genuine providers who are there to deliver your expectations and dreams, not just take your money for personal gain. A great partnership is a win win for all not just frisk the builder or homeowner. For those out there asking for 3 or more quotes from builders you have not done your due diligence and your focus is price, not the complete picture. We as a renovation coy and new home builder work with stunning customers who come to us and we are the only price provider due to our quality of workmanship and our referral network. I so want to see independent quality NZ Builders step up to take back the residential construction market for the benefit of all parties.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115547Reply to #115369Thread #115369Source link

abigale

We are looking at a house and land package with Urban Homes (Waikato) having seen their show homes, but am seeking any feedback on their Hamilton operations; contracts; customer service, post construction engagement/maintenance etc etc.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115507Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113658View thread

Chris M

Hi Sean, sorry for the delay in replying. Yes we went with Greenhomes and are around three weeks from completion. The build has gone well, although we are a bit behind due to the normal raft of schedule changes, issues etc that seem to come with a build. I think there has been more to the build than we all expected but the result is turning into a fantastic house that is more than we hoped for. Our project manager is great and has gone far beyond what many would to make sure that things get done the right way. Greenhomes themselves have a great team and are quick to respond to queries and keep us updated. We spent a long time refining the build details before signing up but as with any build there were things we forgot or wanted to change and Greenhomes had no issues sorting these out for us. If I could upload pictures I would to show how well the house is being completed and how tidy the site has been kept. Thanks Chris
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115478Reply to #115432Thread #113658Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115369View thread

A Smith

Hi Chris (real name!?!?), your questioning of my name is somewhat bizarre & arrogant, perhaps it’s best you stick to the topic here whilst you rant about things you’ve never been part of. You are referring to the contractual side of house construction, which is an important part of getting what you want from your chosen home builder, these are there to safe guard both parties & can work for or against depending on circumstance. I cant argue with the common sense logic in what you put forward but you are focusing on a small part of how these businesses are run (have you ever worked in one before?). I’ve seen lives & careers destroyed due to due childish petulance & arrogance, treating subbies & suppliers like dirt is a fun game & smiling while they drop the axe is par for the cause. They use their position of power to use others as scapegoats for their own incompetence & simply refuse to acknowledge that it is themselves that leads to problems that are left with others to sort for them, often at great personal time &/or expense. You be sure to read that fine print & pay those lawyers… enjoy.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115455Reply to #115427Thread #115369Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115328View thread

Chee

Who did you end up going with? I m in a similar boat and am finding myself not very happy with the gj Gardner contracts.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115452Reply to #115328Thread #115328Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115298View thread

Chris

Hi Brenda, I’ve written on the subject of Prime Cost (PC) and Provisional Sums/Quantities before, so I’ll try to keep this brief. There is nothing wrong or dishonest in principle about the use of PC sums, if they’re used in the correct sense. In fact in theory they should be to the benefit of the client, because they should be used for things like kitchens, carpets, electrical appliances etc. So a sum is allowed for a ‘reasonable’ or average standard or quality, but the client can choose to pay more (or less) for something of a higher or lower standard or quality. So you have flexibility, rather than being forced to take only the one chosen by the builder. But of course this means you must do your homework, and find out before signing the Contract what you’re going to get for the amount allowed. The point is, it should be the client who gets to choose whether to pay more. Where these can be used to take advantage of naive clients is if the client lets the builder put in a PC sum for example for something like electrical work, and the client takes the builder’s word that this is adequate. Then later the client realises it’s only enough for say one light and one power outlet in each room. Enough in theory, but of course not what the client was expecting! But I think you may be referring to Provisional Sums (often mistakenly referred to by people in the building trade as PC sums, because they’re builders, not experts in contract law). These should only be used for things like earthworks and foundations, where the quantity (and therefore cost) cannot be exactly predicted until the work starts, and the engineer/Council have assessed the situation. Of course if you sign the final contract before the detailed design has been finalised, and Building Consent obtained etc, then the number of things that genuinely fall into the category of unknown, and therefore difficult to accurately cost, may be much higher. At the end of the day, the more accurately and completely the soil conditions are investigated (a truism in construction, money spent on site investigation is never wasted), and the building designed, and the more questions the client asks, the more likely you are to complete within your expected budget. Having said all that, even major government projects, designed and supervised by professional engineers, (with specifications and drawings 50mm thick) often have a 10% contingency allowance for unforeseen costs. So in my opinion any client who starts a build without having at least 110% of the contract price available is taking a great risk.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115447Reply to #115298Thread #115298Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115369View thread

Chris

Hi A Smith (real name?), Based on my own experience, while looking into using several different builders (both big name franchise and other) while planning a personal house new build, I definitely agree that many building contracts used in NZ are poorly written and/or biased in favour of the builder to an unacceptable degree. In one case the builder’s own contracts manager could not explain to me how and when a particular clause (involving extra payment if Council consent was delayed) would actually be used. ‘But don’t worry, we never apply it.’ he said. So I said, ‘In that case we can delete it.’ ‘Oh, no, the company owner won’t change anything in the contract wording.’ End of discussion. I spent my career, both overseas and in NZ, as a civil engineer, which frequently involved both interpreting and writing contract documents. Building contracts can vary quite a bit in the details of their wording, but I know what fundamentals should and should not be included. It’s not difficult to get an idea of what those are, by looking at something like the NZ Institute Of Architects Standard Conditions Of Contract, although unfortunately those can only be used if you actually have someone in the role of Architect to administer the Contract. So not really suitable as they stand for use by the majority of people who look at this blog. There are other quite well written forms of contract available, but most builders you approach will not want to use them. So you may be left with trying to make use of the form the builder generally uses. I’ve written some of this on this blog before. In my opinion: -The first thing you should look at (before any money changes hands) is their contract document, and ask whether they’re open to at least considering any kind of change if your lawyer recommends it. If they won’t show it to you, or say no changes are allowed, walk away. -Get someone who knows what they’re doing to vet it. Most solicitors will claim they know how to do that, but believe me many do not. You need a specialist in that area of law. -If you ask for changes to the document which the lawyer says are reasonable, and no compromise wording can be achieved, then walk away. -Be very doubtful if a builder tells you don’t worry, we’ve used this form of contract many times before, and never had any problems. No problems for them possibly, but maybe lots of problems for their clients.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115427Reply to #115369Thread #115369Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115238View thread

John

Agree, Shaun and Jason and Daryl Smith were all cut from the same cloth. There are too many protections and little in it for people to take criminal legal action, so they get to keep doing what they do.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115400Reply to #115238Thread #115238Source link

A Smith

I’ve worked for multiple “group housing firms” (10 years total) and been in the building industry for 25 years. Here’s the thing with 99% of these franchises… they are generally owned and operated by people with little or no knowledge of house construction and very little or no knowledge on how to actually run a business or manage the people within it. Directors very quickly get a god like complex and their ignorant opinions hold sway over fact and reality. They are more interested in hiring people who agree with them than those who actually know what they are doing… both firms I worked for where horrified when I told them that their documentation is misleading. It is quite literally a culture of lies, deceit, arrogance and incompetence being rewarded and applauded… honesty and integrity are quashed well before they have a chance to surface and if you highlight any of this you will be shunned, mocked and ridiculed. They chased me offering big dollars to do their work on contract after I left but in the end… I got sick to death of lies and deceit being employed to cover the arses of incompetent snakes.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115369Source link

Brenda Boehlke

My husband just finished getting his Nelson, NZ retirement home built. (I’m from USA) He used Signature Homes and learned a very expensive lesson. Signature Homes lured him away from Jennian Homes with lower prices and comments about Jennian being way over-priced. Turns out, Jennian was probably the honest builder, whereas Signature Homes took us for a wild ride. At first we thought they were just making lots of costly mistakes in judgement, but, in the end, we realize how they used the PC Sum trap to deliberately underquote the build. Some of their “costs” were 164% higher than their quotes! In all, we lost $58,000 due to their overages. We changed NOTHING in our plans. We are starting the process of a formal complaint. Has anyone here ever had any luck with getting these builders to honor their contracts or “price guarantee?”
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115298Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115293View thread

Brenda Boehlke

Hi, Sorry to not answer your question directly, but I do want to warn you to get PC Sums OUT of your contract. Everywhere! Our pc sums resulted in overages of anywhere from 60% to 164%!!!!! Our house cost $58,000+ MORE than we were quoted, and we changed NOTHING from the original plan. 58K is a huge overage on a 450K budget! So, my only help is in advising you to stay away from Signature Homes, and also to get PC Sums OUT of the contract. Honest contractors need very few of them. We had 2 PAGES of them!!!
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115297Reply to #115293Thread #115293Source link

CG

Just doing some due diligence, anyone built with Greenland Homes Christchurch? What was your experience? How did they deal with any mistakes and were variations due to undervaluing of prime cost or provisional cost items common and add much to the contract price? Would you build with them again? Thanks
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115293Source link

Alice

Halo drops builder insolvency clause: https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/certified-builders-associations-insurance-policy-drops-builder-insolvency-cover/ar-AAGwcJJ?li=BBSVtLJ Of interest to everyone here.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115257Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115107View thread

Allan Moore

Good afternoon. Howard also goes by the name of David Wilson. David/Howard worked for us for a couple of years but now works for another building company. David/Howard left unhappy as a result of a misunderstanding relating to some homes sold in a development. We met and discussed the issue and agreed on a resolution to the issue which we shook hands on. Several months later, after completing several sales with my support and obtaining an offer of employment from another home builder, he decided to renege on the agreement and demanded we pay him what he thought he was owed. We always paid David/Howard everything he was owed on time before and after this misunderstanding arose. David/Howard is a bitter ex-contractor who now works in competition to us and takes every opportunity to disparage us and our business. I invite anybody who is interested in understanding further the reason for David/Howards comments to contact me directly. Regards Allan Moore Signature Homes Botany
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115242Reply to #115227Thread #115107Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115182View thread

Transparent to the Max

Their review is putting apprentices back into the class where they learn nothing. The initiatives will burn the industry as 1) builders will have to be part of either master builders who are a joke and do not protect the home owner, be part of certified builders (applies to both of these organisations) who have group housing coys as members who do not have one qualified builder on their books contracting lbps to them and still paying cheap rates. And the reason for this is access to a guarantee held after a 2 year period or a client of Builtin Insurance or one other insurance provider. This is horse bolting thereafter material. Also an lbp will have to be on every site meaning a shortage of builders increasing build cost hugely. The real need is for extensively qualified proven builders to have a premium status over every other builder who refuses to be licenced as they don’t want to take ownership for their build quality. Speaks volumes eh. Good builders like us are pooled with the every other idiot out there with a licence who is behaving badly and it’s not right. This govtmt needs to put real initiatives in play to circle the good from the bad and their initiatives going forward are not going to do that.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115210Reply to #115186Thread #115182Source link

Transparent to the Max

Being in construction all my life I having sold multiple products in the industry and dealt with many building companies throughout. I am disgusted with the amount of shoddy building work that is being performed in our industry and the attitudes towards customers. It is crippling our industry and reflecting badly on the good ones striving for best business practice. It is a minefield of stress and worry for most people building and/or renovating and getting the right fit as a provider is paramount plus its nearly always the biggest amount of monetary investment made in most peoples lives. The public need to do their due diligence and I mean do their due diligence. Point 1 – we have just completed a build addition and renovation and the two other providers were nearly $400K above us (yes, $400K) and we didn’t cut corners and have made good coin and thats because we have good process, a great team and we pick the right sustainable jobs to build our business. Building does have a right price point but cheap is not always the way to go. Cheap comes with a low quality finish. You need to tick off all the boxes for supply, communication, follow through, personalities and robust business ethics. Contract contract contract limiting the likes of variations or where there are to be variations a set margin added. Point 2 – People think they can manage a build. Some might but some are just plain kidding themselves, want to supply items but don’t realise the ramifications on delays, wrong product and then expect builders to sit and wait whilst not charging for time. This is unethical and not good business practice and any builder who is prepared to do this will not be in business in future and as such you have no warranty comeback. Point 3 – selecting an lbp does not get you the right supply partner. An lbp can be anyone that is a builder but hasn’t done roofing, hasn’t installed windows, hasn’t laid flooring, hasn’t done foundations, has never built a complete residential dwelling from ground up. And people are selecting a builder just because they are an lbp not knowing this. Did you know that most group home builders use contract builders in their businesses and those same contract builders hold the lbp licence for future issues, not the group home builder. Most of these group home builders pay low rates to their contractors and that is why we have so many shonky workmanship comments on this site. Point 4 – there are companies out there marketing renovation franchises specifically detailing they don’t want builders in the business. This is a major issue for NZ going forward and the overheads for any franchise company are huge with franchise fees you pay for a build starting around the 5% mark upwards and all that goes into head office coffers. All I can say is that our industry is amok with disreputable and greedy companies who are not there for a win/win but just to take your hard earned cash and ce la vie so this brings me to my final comment. Do your due diligence, ask them what builds they are currently doing (minimum of 5) ask for referrals you can physically visit and demand to go to the ones of your choosing. Do not take their offered selections. Go to some of their suppliers and ask them what the business is like to deal with and if they are current in trading terms. This will give you a good indication of who you are signing up with and give you some perspective on what they are like. Sales people from most build companies don’t know anything but basics in building and will promise you the earth to get you to sign up and make that deposit. Then you are a captured customer and on the path of no return when the build cost climbs and the variations kick in. Diligence is paramount people PARAMOUNT !!!
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115209Source link

Donna

It has taken me a long time to get up and write this as I try to move forward with building my home, managing the project with my Husband and watch as he works all hours to figure out how to fix all the problems that Gavin, one of the worst builders created. We probably have one of the worst building experiences on this website. We Hired Gavin and Peter Stewart but can’t presently give you full names or company names yet for legal reasons. They are both still in business though. I have learnt to cope with living in a very unfinished house for 5 years now as we save money, fix issues, learn new skills and build our own business to pay for it all. I simply just cope from day to day, month to month and winter is hard. Please anyone who is going to take on the challenge of renovating or building their new home don’t hire Gavin from Albany or Peter Stewart. I want to take them to court and I have consulted Lawyers but getting my house built has been the priority, and even writing this is hard because it forces me to remember everything and think about what has happened because I hired those two builders. We spent $330k with Gavin and Peter before firing them, leaving us financially hit hard. Our house was 90% new build. I can list all the things that were built badly and that list is long so you would need some time to read it all. Two of the major issues is that my entire house cladding was done really badly, the cladding was at all angles, the sizes of the weatherboards were all different and some of the cladding wasn’t even nailed onto the wood underneath so it was held up by the building paper, which was also done badly. The other huge problem was that all the walls, floors and ceilings were not plumb, not level, some on a stupid angle. My entrance way was a parallelogram when it was supposed to be a rectangle. The floor was so bad that most doors would have not opened/closed properly inside unless fixed, and figuring out how to fix all of this has cost my family about $200k. Most of the prenailed frames were way out of plumb, out of square, in fact I don’t think the builder ever used a level? The steel beams had to be re-done because they were so badly installed, the engineer failed them at first inspection. We had to recladd the whole house, ripping out the brand new cladding as it was installed so badly. Face sizing all wrong, out of level, boxed corners not meeting around corners. Even our foundations have needed extra repairs as the poles were done badly. Even when Gavin was on site he was fixing his own mess, but badly and at our expence. Our replacement building firm had a huge task fixing this, costing us another $200k, then they went into receivership so we are trying to manage this ourselves. No building firm is willing to fix this mess, most won’t even return a call.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115182Source link
Reply in discussion thread #115076View thread

EdSmith

Not surprised, this guy has been ruining people’s lives for years now……lack of communication, contractors not getting paid, bullying tactics, staff walking out, he has had to operate for way too long and needs to get out of industry so he doesnt ruin more innocent peoples live, its a disgrace that he is still operating.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115081Reply to #115077Thread #115076Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114979View thread

Cameron

Have you come across green homes? Ask for Hamish, he was really great to deal with and got most of the PC sums removed and actual costs put in before the fixed price offer.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #115023Reply to #114979Thread #114979Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114874View thread

D

Hi Regan, I know the franchises are owned by different people BUT there appears to be a culture of grabbing money and not giving a damn at Platinum Homes that I would be very wary of. I entered into a contract with Platinum Homes it the Central North Island to build a home 31 months ago and it is still thwart with problems from shoddy building practices. It took 18 months to actually get possession of the home. I was initially told that he would have the home up in 6 months. My wife had metastatic breast cancer and the house was to be her sanctuary for the cancer battle. Our battle was less with cancer and more with the builder who allegedly took on 25 builds in the year ( fine if he had the trades to do so but he didn’t so he would just do a little work here; a little work there and not care about the deadlines and experiences of his clients). He allegedly was late for many of his clients. My wife became despondent …..with the build, with our hope, with cancer and then with life. She killed herself in May of last year; the house was ” finished” in July. Too late for her and nightmare for me. The builder was well aware of her illness when he took the build on. He promised me that he would pull out all stops to get it finished ASAP. He would even “put on his own tool belt”. They are the most despicable, disrespectful people. I wrote to their head office and received NOTHING back. Not a thing. If you have another builder option where you live I would recommend you take your business there. In my experience, this group of builders have no respect for their clients. I am going to provide media with the story as I think people need to know what they may be getting into with these builders. People need to know what to look for in their contracts; the warning signs of builder deceit. More importantly, we need to help fellow kiwi’s weed out the cowboys from this problematic trade. Good luck
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114993Reply to #114874Thread #114874Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114818View thread

Hadenough

Master builders are useless, they are there to protect their members and nobody else. I have spent a lot of money with lawyer’s trying to help but master builders don’t want to know
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114893Reply to #114891Thread #114818Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114680View thread

Gerard

Hi Hutton Contracting done a fabulous job on my two dwellings out at beach rd browns bay. they are high quality builders that have built nice houses in the past. you can find him online huttoncontracting.co.nz.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114886Reply to #114680Thread #114680Source link

Alice

We are the victims of a cowboy builder in Wellington. $50K of defects and associated costs so far. Our situation aside, was disgusted that he was already the subject of a LBP Board investigation for negligence while he was busy constructing our extension not to plans, consent or building code. Further inquiry reveals that to be an LBP you only need a carpentry qualification, two referees and a telephone interview. No character referees, drug tests, or even a police check. Investigations take months and months, with no restrictions or supervision of the builder (unlike other professions where they are either stood down or work under supervision). No wonder we still have leaky buildings. Of course if it goes wrong, the LBP can quickly shut down their company to avoid all claims. Good to see the government has announced a review of the construction industry: https://www.mbie.govt.nz/have-your-say/building-system-legislative-reform-programme-public-consultation?fbclid=IwAR0R3iEJk1jX86m5bJMjyxmnvvws1sGrV3M1uY2dhUOz3kwpqa4zfwrnC0U Hope other affected homeowners submit their experiences! If you are entering a construction contract, I suggest you add a clause for drug testing and police checks seeing as the licensing board doesn’t bother. Odd that a hammer hand or forklift operator may have to pass these basic requirements, but an LBP director can do what they like.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114862Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114225View thread

Sheryl Mitchinson

We were contracted by BCL Homes to do some work on one of their builds, it has taken 6 months to be paid. They are terrible business people, dishonest, use everyone and live the champagne lifestyle while their creditors wait. They owe money all over the place and we have heard nothing but negative things. Baillie Construction Limited, BCL tiny homes
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114838Reply to #114814Thread #114225Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114774View thread

Chris

Hi Brie, All good advice. In connection with builders putting in ‘standard’ provisions (or alternatively PC or Provisional Sums) which are unlikely to give you what you want in the finished build, please see my post yesterday on PC and Prov. Sums. But regarding my other comment, about how many people in NZ seem to get involved in building a house, when they have limited or no experience of building or building contracts, I have to ask, ‘Who on earth would employ a builder to design and build a house on their land, without first checking themselves to see whether there are any covenants, and making sure the builder is aware of them and has complied with them in the design, or priced to comply with them during construction?’.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114833Reply to #114829Thread #114774Source link

Janine and martin green

We recently had a terrible experience with latitude homes hawkes bay. Please don’t use them! Debbie the owner is unprofessional and worse customer service ever. They don’t seem to understand the variation process. We thought we had been very thorough in our specs and drawings and every turn they added money or delivered anything but what we had specified with excuses at every turn. We went over time and budget and still didn’t get what we wanted. The final product was rubbish. We went to lawyers but latitude homes didn’t seem to care and didn’t comply. We have now found two other couples in our small neighbourhood who have the same problems recently. We’ve had issues with costs for site works and foundations. Windows and doors arriving too large so the builder hacked away at the framing to get them to fit then made the holes too large and used extensive amounts of expanding foam to just fill gaps. They installed sliding doors that weren’t the ones we asked for then made us pay for new ones. We still have a double bed sitting in our hallway as they made the hallway unusually narrow and used narrow doors. We now cant fit a standard bed in to a 4mt by 5mt room! to be honest we didn’t think to even check. Terrible paint finish we still have holes in our walls where the electrician has moved plug sockets even though we moved in in October last year. Trying to get anything remedied has been a nightmare. Weve sent lawyers letters but they just don’t listen. We are not sure what else to do. We have concrete patios that are uneven and rough and multiple colors. The list goes on. The head office seems to have no control over the other franchises so these sorts of companies are terrible to work with. One piece of advice would be don’t go with a group type builder. In this case it seems latitude homes is just a logo that any ‘builder’ can buy and head office have no control over quality or if things going wrong. The business owner is unprofessional and extremely defensive as the builder is her son. Her son was often rude to us and had terrible time management often showing up to site in the late afternoon and then rushing to get things done leaving a un satisfactory result. In our opinion he was too young and inexperienced and if we had met him prior we would of cut our losses. We’ve built before and know the process and the two companies couldn’t have been any more different. Debbie at latitude homes is terrible to deal with and seems to have no process for anything. On our final inspection she showed up with no paper work and kept denying being able to see any issues. She took a scrap paper out of her handbag to write things on. It’s ridiculous. They kept using different contractors as they burn bridges and contractors don’t want to work with them. Then when work isn’t to standard we just get left with the mess or an additional bill. If you want to speak to us please contact me or reply to this message. Small claims court looks like our only other option.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114818Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114584View thread

David

Yes, agree with Sarah. We had a very similar expense on our first build in Wellington for soft ground. In the scheme of things, especially given there were changes to positioning, this is small. You should always have 4-5% contingency set aside (preferably that the builder doesn’t know about) even with a fixed price contract for these types of things plus for the inevitable upgrades, curtains, landscaping etc. But all changes and variations should be formalised and signed by both parties, or at least agreed to before they commence via email.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114591Reply to #114587Thread #114584Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114586View thread

David

Yes, agree. We had a similar figure on our first build in Wellington, and in the scheme of things this is small, there were changes to layout that were not originally envisaged. You should have a budget of, in my experience, 4-5% sitting to the side as a contingency even on fixed price contracts for these types of eventualities (and for the inevitable nice-to-have upgrades you may want later, plus curtains and landscaping).
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114590Reply to #114588Thread #114586Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114584View thread

David

Hi Jurgen, if it is genuinely just for levelling the section, then the answer should be no. But often, unless a comprehensive geotech report was done prior to starting the build, the builder may find soft ground that needs more fill to make it sufficiently stable for building on. If this is the case, it is almost always specifically allowed for in the contract in terms of unknown “ground conditions”. You can probably Ctrl+F on that phrase in your contract to see how they describe it.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114585Reply to #114584Thread #114584Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114567View thread

Peter Quinn

Hi As we only joined Master Builders two years ago and checking my emails for the past five years ago I would suggest you are clearly mistaken. If you had done due diligence with your solicitor, any issues with this contract would had been clearly pointed out to you. My comments were merely an example of how things can be done better to protect clients like in your case.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114573Reply to #114572Thread #114567Source link

David

Spoiler Alert: If you believe a Master Builder is actually giving you a “fixed price contract”, you are probably wrong. We have spent the last 2 months “dating” A1 Homes. We found a plan that could work, with a few revisions, and agreed specs down to the taps and window latches. We have built before, so know exactly what we want, and they provided a fixed price estimate (crucially, not a quote) to our specs. It seemed like a fair price so we were keen to continue. They then said we would need to spend $3,000 on drawings and colour consultants before they could give us an actual fixed price quote. That is a lot of money – we have previously had quotes done on concept drawings that cost us $1,500 and $1,955 respectively. Eventually we came round to the idea, but we asked to see the contract they intended to use before we forked over $3,000. That’s when it got hairy. A1 presented us with a “standard” Registered Master Builders Association contract. The problem is that Clause 46 of the contract (2018 edition) specifically allows the builder to charge us more if ANY aspect of the build turns out to be pricier than the fixed price quote. i.e. it directly contradicts the claim of a fixed price quote. Further, Clause 101 of the contract (which has grown by about 60 clauses since we last built, practically all of them skewed toward the builder), specifically allows for a situation where A1 is building for Mrs Smith down the road and if that gets delayed, they can delay your start and end date. And with Clause 46 locking in their ability to on-charge any costs that might arise because prices rose since they gave you a not-fixed fixed price quote, they’ve ensured whatever their project management skills, you will pick up the tab. Oh and by the way, they have your deposit of 5% while they retain the right to delay indefinitely while they finish Mrs Smith’s project. We queried these 2 clauses and a couple of others. A1’s response was simply that they don’t ever change clauses. They had no answer for my question of how they could claim they offered a fixed price contract when it wasn’t. They said they hadn’t charged more than the fixed price on the 2 years they had used the contract, which frankly didn’t give me enough peace of mind to hand them $500K on the back of a contract that still says they can crank up the price at any time. I spoke to a Director of Master Build Services who confirmed there was nothing stopping them deleting irrelevant clauses in the contract; A1 was simply choosing not to. In the end, we were not willing to risk our money on a “no surprises guarantee” that isn’t any guarantee at all and could potentially hold a very nasty surprise. We suggest you give this a lot of thought and question whoever you build with if they have the same wide-open clauses in the contract.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114567Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114517View thread

A C

Fowler Homes Southern Lakes are not paying their sub contractors. Big issues here!
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114535Reply to #114528Thread #114517Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114484View thread

Sarah

Hi Andrew – I did build a steel framed home with Golden Homes but I don’t have any noise issues so can’t help you there. However just wanted to say good luck with GH because I ended up suing them for another matter – in my opinion they are total asshats and the general manager is (again in my personal opinion) a nasty piece of work who is not interested in compromising or managing conflicts in any helpful way, shape or form, just wants a fight every single time. I’m guessing you will probably end up having to go down the legal route too. 🙁
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114531Reply to #114484Thread #114484Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113971View thread

Matt

Also in the same boat – signed a build contract last November and still looking at a piece of slab. Massive delays, false promises, terrible communication, rumours of rifts between them and their contractors (some not being paid so refusing to do further work). In too deep at this stage and must now wait for completion. Their build contract covers their arses for EVERYTHING.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114157Reply to #114078Thread #113971Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114139View thread

Mark

Hi Donna Can I recommend you carefully review the Master Build contract and consider others. Please see below for comments.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114147Reply to #114142Thread #114139Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114139View thread

Peter Quinn

Hi Donna I didnt relise you were in Christchurch Dont get fooled by our website, we do all levels of pricing and against the housing companies we are much more competitive as we dont have any overheads and why we are doing so well. I would love the opoortunity to work with you on your project. We offer a fixed price contract where others dont so once you sign the master build contracts, there are no suprises through construction which you will get with others. Our quality and finish is outstanding and you will see from our feedback. We also take control of our quality as we will only use one team of subtrades so there are no variations in our quality Cheers Peter
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114142Reply to #114141Thread #114139Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114065View thread

Sarah

Ah, having read this comment I hadn’t realised that the builder only bought the section after fences were erected. Unfortunately I don’t think the other owners will be able to go after him for half the cost. They erected the fences when the Developer still owned the land as as you rightly say, the Developer (in all subdivisions) never has responsibility to pay half of fencing put up if they still own the section next door. So if the builder waited deliberately to purchase until fences were up then as you say morally wrong, but legally nothing can be done. 🙁
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114083Reply to #114079Thread #114065Source link
Reply in discussion thread #114065View thread

Polly

No Jane, it is in the Canterbury area. Nevertheless, I think this can happen anywhere. I think there needs to be a change in the Fencing Act as while it may be legal, in my opinion, it is morally reprehensible.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #114067Reply to #114066Thread #114065Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113971View thread

Sarah

I suggest you use the search function on this site as Platinum are one of the most complained about companies on here. They have used legal threats against the person running this site to have countless comments removed. Also look at the top of the site at the comment Mark has made about it/them.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113975Reply to #113971Thread #113971Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113676View thread

Tony Songhurst

Hi, In reply to your query reading building a minor dwelling, we have done several in Howick over the last coupe of years. and are currently designing another. Happy to meet and discuss the process. Regards Tony. 0274758445
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113926Reply to #113676Thread #113676Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113897View thread

Mark

Hi Robyn Can I refer you to the comments at the top of the page where we’ve been threatened with legal action by Landmark Counties/Manukau over comments from clients on this page. cheers Mark G
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113925Reply to #113923Thread #113897Source link
Reply in discussion thread #107173View thread

LM

The home we built with Baillee construction was when they first established their company. It’s run by a businessman not a builder so really has no idea what’s he’s doing. I don’t want to say too much on here sorry as I’ve in the past been threatened with lawyers re. Slander – even though it’s all true. All I’ll say is if you ask around the Manawatu – you’ll no doubt get ya answer! Not just from clients but contractors too!! Lauzanne15@hotmail.com if you want to talk further. Would be interested to know what’s happened for you…
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113674Reply to #113668Thread #107173Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113562View thread

Chris

Sounds like the exact same experience I had with Signature Homes North Shore. Treated us like royalty until we signed the contract. They were over the moon when we put pen to paper but after that they were like completely different people and didn’t want to know us. I have decided to manage the whole process myself for my next build that I am just kicking off. I don’t think I will ever use a group home build company again. It’s just to hard to get back on track once things start going peer shaped.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113666Reply to #113663Thread #113562Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113572View thread

Sam

Whare is the law, can anyone stop these goons and take severe action against this company? Is there anyone in this group who could help or guide to take legal action jointly. We are not living in jungle and this must be stopped.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113643Reply to #113603Thread #113572Source link
Reply in discussion thread #113419View thread

Martin

Hey Sanjay, that are at the higher end of build companies but for the experience of building 4 homes you get what you pay for. This is the only build company I have worked with that has stuck to the contract price. The only variations we have had, have been due to changes we have made during the build (example was changing a window to a door and an upgrade to kitchen worktops).
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #113522Reply to #113517Thread #113419Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70561View thread

Leanne

Hi HobPointOwner, we are currently experiencing a similar situation with GJ’s Whangarei franchise. We signed on with them at the end of April 2016 and were told our home would take about 8 months to complete. That was 15 months ago. They blame contractors and anyone else they can for delays. The owner, Peter Butler, is awful to deal with and has sent us emails with comments we feel are unprofessional. I contacted HO a few weeks ago and have found them to be absolutely no support at all – they just keep saying they’ve talked about it and will make changes in their training, which doesn’t help our current situation! We have also found the franchise terrible communicators.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #109771Reply to #70645Thread #70561Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70347View thread

Kelly

Hi Nadia, Did you end up finding a builder in North Canterbury? I would be interested to hear who you chose as there are a number of smaller builders around (and personally I’m not that keen on the larger building companies, too many horror stories and too little control over who you get as your contractor). Thanks, Kelly
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #83423Reply to #70347Thread #70347Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70347View thread

robynne

We are considering Landmark Whangarei. Was the build on time. Is there good insurance to cmlete the build. Did you get any nasty surprises with costs during build or was it fixed price. Thankyou.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #81206Reply to #70373Thread #70347Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70561View thread

HobPointOwner

Just finished building with GJ NorthWest (owned by same people as North Shore; Tony Houston) and it was a very drawn out costly process. We have built before (with Nautica Homes – who were amazing). Comparing the experiences this was an absolute shocker! If you build with GJ thinking you can always call the Head Office for support think again. They are not interested in helping. I won’t say to much on this forum as we are considering further action however what I would say is – if you are thinking of building with this GJ franchise then get a good lawyer to push back on clauses in the contract before signing. Also be prepared for your move in date to be changed several times and for you to NOT be communicated with or fobbed off on a regular basis.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70645Reply to #70604Thread #70561Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70341View thread

Anne

As you point out their contract proposals etc work in their favour and the detail isn’t always available. We asked on several occasions before and after signing and they say what you want to hear. We had built before (different company) and had a great experience in every way. In hindsight we should never have built with GJ North Shore/West franchise which is owned by Tony Houston however we thought that being a big company they would be professional, that there was the backing of the head office etc etc. Yes we had a 10% reserve as we knew we wanted to upgrade things – little did we know we would end up spending some of that on lawyers fees. We are in our house now, on going issues however we are thankful that we are almost at the end of the process and we know that we will never ever build with GJ Gardner again.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70550Reply to #70547Thread #70341Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70425View thread

Anne

They will bully you into paying and promise to fix everything. Invest in a building disputes lawyer now, may cost you a couple of thousands but its the only way to hold money back and get action. The sales process is slick, head office offer absolutely no assistance and GJ North Shore owned by Tony Houston say don’t worry we will fix it and you get fobbed off.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70489Reply to #70484Thread #70425Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70425View thread

Peter

Hi Anne, that is disappointing to hear. I hope the remainder of your building experiences improves and hopefully meets your expectations. I’m considering entering a contract with the same GJ franchise currently. Would you be happy for me to contact you by email to discuss your experiences as well as things to watch out for? Kind regards, Peter
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70448Reply to #70429Thread #70425Source link

Glen

We are in the process of building with Stonewood in Rodney. Chaos! The left and right hand are doing different things. They are sending us variations to contract with huge additional costs with a complete disregard for our finances or any form of consultation before making changes. Their policy is not to give cost breakdown for these variations but instead you are expected to sign off thousands of dollars with a one line explanation in a language that someone not in the trade will struggle to understand. We are pushing back but believe me it is not making for a pleasant customer experience. I have heard that this is the same of any building company out there….it probably is…but would it not be nice to be with a company who does not make you feel fleeced every day? PS…at the time of writing this we dont even have the slab down so it is a long road ahead!
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70425Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70324View thread

SallyN

Hey RR, its a miserable place to be, I totally get you. If you can’t afford a lawyer then a good idea would be to try the citizens advice bureau to see if they can give you some help and point you in the right direction. Is the builder a Master Builder? Do you have a guarantee in place? Because that would be the next step if so. Good luck.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70384Reply to #70324Thread #70324Source link

zeshanahmed

BUILDING COMPANY REVIEWS have been building the dream homes for a lot of families who got satisfied with the strong and durable homes he made for them that too with the creative designing. Building Contractor in Pakistan
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70367Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70347View thread

David

Hi Nadia, what part of Christchurch are you looking at building? I’m about to start the process of building in Church Bay (Diamond Harbour) which is also very windy. We are avoiding the larger building companies and going with a smaller company (Strategic Homes) who actually use Paul McStay Homes for the build. From everything I have read I would recommend considering some of the reputable smaller companies, and they can still offer a fixed price.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70348Reply to #70347Thread #70347Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70324View thread

RR

Hi Chris, thanks for replying. At present there is no lawyer involved as finances are tied up at the moment. We have taken thousands of pics, and have a diary of events that have been happening. We are just sick and tired of the past 2 years and want to be left alone-not wait for people to keep coming and assess things
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70335Reply to #70334Thread #70324Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70324View thread

Chris

Hi RR, I’m sure there are others reading this blog who can offer a more expert opinion, but in my view you need a lawyer who knows something about building contracts to look at yours. Because I suspect that what you can now do may depend on exactly what that says, together with any correspondence between you and the builder, and records such as site diaries, and photos you may have taken. In fact I’d be a bit surprised if you didn’t respond to me, by saying you have had a lawyer working on it for many months. It would be very difficult to say what else you should do now, or whether you can withhold payment etc, without seeing all of the above documents.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70334Reply to #70324Thread #70324Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70142View thread

jacksonp

Don’t go near Stonewood Homes in Christchurch. I went there and have rued that decision for the last 3 years. The quality of workmanship is appalling, the customer service non existent, the build time took twice as long as my previous build leaving me out of pocket many $$$$’s. Fixing the problems with the build will take years and if not fixed during Stonewood’s warranty period will have to get done under the Master Build Guarantee . I see they are restructuring and have brought in some heavy hitters but that will not change anything. They got greedy, took on too much work, employed below par sub contractors and instead of protecting a reputation with good customer service and a quality product ended up alienating a lot of people and lost a lot of potential clients.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70259Reply to #70142Thread #70142Source link

Nigel Harrison

Have had a look at many of these comments and my comments as follows. I am considering a new or major refurbishment and I have time to do considerable investigation. Some observations. Most people do not read the contract before signing or if they do skim over it and any queries whitewashed by the sales team. You cannot tar the franchisees of a particular franchise with the same brush. One might be useless in one area and good in another. I believe its too much effort for a franchisee to change their standard contract, most likely supplied by the franchisor and perhaps a few extra mods/additions by the local franchisee. While investigating a new build during 2015, Platinum Homes in New Plymouth would not change their standard contract. The contract is waited in the franchisees favour. The one post on GJ Gardener confirms my statement. Would be useful to hear from any one else on this aspect. Contractors in general, not just builders rub their hands if you make specification changes during the contract. They make money out of this. PC sums. You can do your own homework on this from a cost perspective. PC sums usually for kitchens, tap ware, bathrooms and lighting. If you don’t have time to do any legwork then be prepared to pay extra on PC sums as what you select is likely to exceed the sum allowed by design. One advantage with one of the bigger franchises is the possibility of them having tied up material supplier to get volume discounts not available to the small one man builder. This has to be weighed up against possible better service and lower overheads of the small builder. Having lived in SA most of my life and in NZ for the last 18 years I’ve come to the conclusion that builders are opportunists and will take as many shortcuts as possible and more if given half the chance. This is probably a world wide phenomena as well. As an Engineer I am glad that since the leaky homes debacle and Chch earthquake that the building standards have been tightened up and Licensed Building Practitioners are required to do building work. There are some people who call this red tape. I welcome it even if it adds $10 to $20k to the cost of a house.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70232Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70224View thread

Lauren

Your build sounds like how our build went with GJs Rodney – The sales man was excellent and very approachable. Then the build started off really fast (with some weather delays which were out of our control but what you’d expect building in Winter). They managed to complete almost everything and get us in before Christmas with the promise that they’d fix the remainder and sort out CCC after everyone was back at work – we believed them, paid all the outstanding money and now are still waiting for them to come back and complete work that was in the contract… They’ve been replying to our emails and stuff so I hope they’ll be back soon to complete everything but it’s a very frustrating position to be in… BUT we love our house, the finish is excellent and more than we hoped for. The design we picked suited us perfectly after a few modifications and everyone there is more than willing to help you. We would definitely build with GJs again but we would make sure the house is just the way we want it with everything completed before paying the last of the money and moving in
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70231Reply to #70225Thread #70224Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70224View thread

Mike Powell

1 week out from completing a reasonably large build with GJ Rodney, I can provide a further update here. Our build has been a roller coaster, we have had highs, we have had lows but I think with the best level of planning this is an inevitability. We have had our moments, but with constant vigilance, some necessary rework and calling things out, the result looks good. One thing you won’t see with GJ is a delay in getting started, they are quick to get the ball rolling. That said one of the things I would recommend is being a lot tougher with the contract negotiation, specifically LD’s for delay, and a more equitable final payment and warranty period. Their contract is very much their contract and they need to wake up here. In any project building or otherwise you have the delta to manage between sales and planning phase and then the actual delivery. GJ’s selling machine is pretty slick, possibly too slick and you will feel a bump when the post sale experience kicks in. Spend the time and be as specific as possible in the spec, it minimizes cost surprises later and also reduces ambiguity between you said and they said. Read it , study the plans and if you think there is something wrong or a deviation, call it out . Have an independent advisor confirm your concerns. Just don’t assume that everything that is happening is right. If you don’t have confidence in their PM , demand they swap them out. You can’t set and forget a building project , you need to be involved. At the same time you need a PM that is approachable, takes responsibility, can manage pressure that comes with pulling a multithreaded delivery together and is on top of everything. The same applies to sub contractors proposed for the build. Where possible find out who they are, meet them and form your own impression. Happy for you to come and take a look at the result. You can even see the state the property is left in at handover. Email me mjpowell@mac.com I know how big a choice of builder can be. You need to take the time , look around and talk to people who have been through the process with your likely shortlist suppliers. Show homes, brochures and media advertising do not provide a balanced view. The big question would I use GJ again? With the learnings from this build, they would be on my shortlist for sure but with some definite modifications to the whole approach.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70225Reply to #70224Thread #70224Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70142View thread

Skilled builder

Fairly naïve response. Just asking them to be honest wont work. They lied on their disclosure statement to us. So why would they be honest about paying their subs. Eyes wide open. Run the contract past a lawyer, school yourself on the minimum information to be provided in the contract. I’m in the business and still got caught out. If the information that is supposed to be provided was correct, we wouldn’t have gone with them. But you don’t know until you know and now we know. This will form the basis of our court case against them.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70173Reply to #70157Thread #70142Source link
Reply in discussion thread #70071View thread

Mike Powell

Totally agree , coming to the end of a large build with GJ. Having experienced what we have to date , I would not use them again. Totally agree re the comment from TS on contracting. Their contract is onerous, one sided and they refuse to move on any point. I raised this concern and was basically told we are big, we are the best, you have nothing to worry about. The reality, yes you do. Project Management is sloppy, communication is a challenge and all up a pretty dismal customer experience
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #70153Reply to #70108Thread #70071Source link

Mandy

Bloggers, why waste our time making comments on this type of blog!! GUYS WHO ARE WE? Mere homemakers, some first home builders and ignorant at building!! What good does it do to make less than favourable comments on a blog site like this – don’t bother!!! We need the government to sort these dishonest group building companies out. Yes whatever it is that your company does, no matter how you do it, you make a promise to each and every customer that darkens your virtual door. You enter into a contract, even if the terms aren’t explicitly stated. The consumer pays you something, and you promise to provide a product or a service. There are pledges of quality and quickness. Customer service involves living up to your word on these matters, but it really gets to shine when something goes wrong – correct? Here’s the thing. Mistakes are opportunities — golden ones. Here’s why. Studies show that a satisfied customer will tell 2-3 people about his experience with your company. A dissatisfied consumer will share their lament with 8-10 people and some will push that number to twenty and those twenty people will tell 100 people and so on. Is this bog site going to that many unassuming new home building families? But here’s the opportunity. An unhappy customer will become a loyal consumer if you fix his complaint and do it quickly. Eighty percent (80%) of these folks will come back to you if you’ve treated them fairly. That percentage rises to the upper 90s if you respond immediately. Every day you have the chance to transform your mistakes into returning customers — the kind who will tell other people good things about you. Imagine that. It is not so much the trades & suppliers who work for these group housing companies, (who, by the way are screwed down for the cheapest rate and then have to wait a month in Sundays to get paid), it is the actual group housing franchisees, who are making a killing in more ways than one, abusing us along the way. What is happening to the 1128 comments on this site, are the housing companies even bought to task about some of the horrendous dishonest behaviour and shoddy customer service when something goes wrong? We say get together and petition the government. We have taken this to our MP and lawyer, maybe you should do the same, and then maybe we can get some traction on this site. Otherwise post this site to your FB page and make an even bigger fuss.
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #69943Source link

Maryka

Hi, Has anyone build with either GJ/Horncastle recently in Rolleston CHCH, about to signed a contract with one of them, trying to decide with one is it going to be… Any pros or cons will be helpfull
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #69891Source link

Overthehill

Hi, re the comment about builders getting fed up with clients seeing fixed price and then not doing proper research/not understanding bespoke designs…Some of us are reluctant new home builders, having lost our original homes in the Christchurch earthquakes. I knew absolutely nothing about building. Why should I? My occupation and background do not require it. Yet, over four years on, I am dealing with the complexities of an architectural rebuild. I think it would have been great if the building companies I dealt with had looked out of their own bubbles and realised that in this case, their clients’ ignorance is not something to be disdained and exploited. It is just normal, and so just realise that things need to be explained really well. For example, I never knew what a Variation was, never knew there was the margin I had to pay for anything after contract was signed. I did ask the BC, now is there anything I should know about extra costs, and they said no, assuming I suppose I knew about Variations and GDT. Hence i blithely signed the building contract 3 years ago, and now face forking out nearly $100,000 in variations, including margin fee and GST. Stuff like carpets and better wooden flooring, and upgraded bathroom fittings (the contract ones were underspecced, i later learned) I would have organised to be in the contract had I known…..
Historical discussionNot independently verified
Source detailsComment #69219Source link